Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Sandstein 08:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pascal Lorne[edit]

Pascal Lorne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references are PR and notices from what i have been able to understand (some of them are in french which i know very little of and i don't trust google translate for large chunks of text). Pascal Lorne seems less notable then the companies that he worked for. The current one Gojob was created by the same editor as Pascal Lorne, User:ABCreator who has been blocked for promotional editing and advertising, and was deleted for failing notability and was at best WP:TOOSOON (see here. the article Pascal Lorne was originally tagged with a WP:PROD notice which was swiftly removed by ABCreator shortly after which can be assumed good faith but given his edit history/block log seems to be a way of advertising requesting further comments. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is there a source that is more unsuitable for an encyclopedia than https://about.me/pascall? Mduvekot (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply