The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pagaivanuku Arulvai[edit]

Pagaivanuku Arulvai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously included at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthiya Mugam (unreleased film). Unreleased since 2021. The contents are well sourced so this article is better draftified. Per Wikipedia:Notability (films), Similarly, films produced in the past which were either not completed or not distributed should not have their own articles, unless their failure was notable per the guidelines DareshMohan (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and Tamil Nadu. — Karnataka ^talk 19:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I agree not a notable film. Delete it. I created this article because someone requested me on my talk page, later regreted for creating this article. Hyderabadi (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above. Draftification is an WP:ATD option but I think it's easy enough to recreate if it is both released and asserted to be notable. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.