The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paddy Shovlin[edit]

Paddy Shovlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He is a property developer. Ok. But why he should be on wikipedia? This question has not been answered anywhere in the article. As such he fails GNG. 2Joules (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, not a notable property developer, fails GNG. Spleodrach (talk) 10:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The information provided has enough in-depth coverage for stand-alone biography article and represents basic facts about the individual. I noticed a lot of biography pages for individuals on Wikipedia are similar. Therefore I would suggest adding either a stub note or notice that this article may not meet Wikipedia’s notability. (Please have a look at the following examples: Jorge L. Araneta, Thomas Kramer, Michael Shanly) Littledger (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)— Littledger (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  @Littledger: Please don't make WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments. Each article stands or falls on its own merits regardless of what else may exist on Wikipedia. Adding a notability tag doesn't solve the problem; if a subject is not notable, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. The only valid argument for keeping is what you wrote in your first sentence above. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable & promotionalHeshiv (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.