Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MetaMetrics[edit]

MetaMetrics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My extensive PROD quickly removed with the solely thin and unconvincing basis of source adding because my concerns were stalwart with the listed concerns and nothing else suggests this is an otherwise acceptable article, and that's because it's clearly an advertisement for the company and by said company, this has literally not changed and it's not expected to if it's a company-initiated advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete apart from the blatantly promotional tone of the article, all I'm finding in a basic BEFORE is press releases and corporate ownership coverage - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete All in agreement with nom and David. Nothing to write about this organizations. Light2021 (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as spam; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply