Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pittston, Pennsylvania. czar 06:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor of Pittston, Pennsylvania[edit]

Mayor of Pittston, Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of mostly non-notable mayors of a small city. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pittston has a population under 8K, so the office is unnotable. I've nominated for Afd three of the five mayors who have articles. One was already nominated, and the fifth was a member of the House of Representatives. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge a significantly trimmed version of this into Pittston, Pennsylvania. While it's true that the city isn't large enough to hand its mayors an automatic WP:NPOL pass, a basic mostly unlinked list of the mayors' names isn't unreasonable information for us to maintain, so long as it's properly sourced and not a WP:HOAX. It doesn't need to be a standalone list if there's nowhere for it to link besides the city itself and one mayor who cleared NPOL for other reasons — but it's not unreasonable for them to be listed as a subsection in the city's main article rather than as a standalone spinoff. Bearcat (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply