The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MPP Global[edit]

MPP Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From company Promotional writing of an article to references used for press or news coverage. Everything is promotional and nothing else. No-notability of this organization. references are PR exercise of company or clearly influenced by the company the way it is being covered by media. If we have to make a Wikipedia page for being an encyclopedia in this manner. wikipedia is not a portfolio or directory of such company Light2021 (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Salt as there are several things to note here: One is that it's an obvious advertisement (once deleted before in 2009 until it was restarted to this current one in 2011), then it was actually unbelievably accepted in 2011 when AfC was a madhouse of advertisements (though it still is), and then the sources and information listed are all simply advertisements, wherever published, because advertising is still advertising, and the several advert-only accounts here emphasize it. SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. There is coverage, but everything I see is brief mentions. Willing to change my !vote if anyone can point out some in-depth coverage to take a look at. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PROMO; no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.