The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Loran (cassette)[edit]

Loran (cassette) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-prodded (courtesy ping Necrothesp). Original nomination rationale was: Reads like a personal reflection on a non-notable product brand. SITH (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Draftify. Nothing here to establish notability and plenty of POV statements; at minimum a case for "draftification". Britishfinance (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There isn't really any information available to write about this subject. I don't feel that it meets WP:GNG. Search only gives up few links to some social media sites, and e-commerce platforms. I am able to find a few sources about the company, than this particular product. I don't think they are good enough establish notability as well. KCVelaga (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.