The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of international goals scored by Harry Kane[edit]

List of international goals scored by Harry Kane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page does fail WP:NOTSTATS, WP:GNG and WP:OR Dr Salvus 18:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the reasons I expressed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#List of international goals scored by Harry Kane. We have also deleted similar articles such as List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain (who has scored one more goal than Kane), List of international goals scored by Sergio Ramos (deleted G7 after informal discussion). Joseph2302 (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Valid WP:CONTENTFORK in my opinion, the article neither violates WP:NOTSTATS nor is it WP:OR. We have multiple articles of this nature. It would have passed WP:GNG if Mattythewhite didn't do this edit by removing the BBC refs which talk about his goals in detail which in essence makes the article pass GNG, by the way of removing them and leaving soccerway in fact weakens the article. I would have merged it back if Harry Kane's article wasn't so large. Govvy (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was restoring the list to how it was at the Kane article before the separate list was created, by removing the non-standard notes column and the excessive references. I would note that WP:GNG states that a topic is expected to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" for it to be "presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list": it isn't stated that such sources necessarily need to be included in the article in question. Although I doubt that routine BBC match reports would be enough to satisfy the GNG, anyway. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Often there is analysis on a BBC match report page, an article will say how a goal is scored, this adds the depth needed for GNG, which soccerway does not provide. Govvy (talk) 10:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. None of the refs are about his goals in any detail (failing GNG; match reports don't care), and he is not national record holder. Does not need to be a separate article. GiantSnowman 20:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as it meet doesn't the standard for international goals lists, with the original list at the Kane article being restored. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Harry Kane similar to what's been done at List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain. I could see people searching for this when List of international goals scored by Wayne Rooney for example exists so it might be useful to keep as a redirect. However, per nom, it's not notable enough for a standalone article so fails WP:GNG. Can be restored if it becomes notable. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Not a useful topic, i agree with the nom. that this article is WP:NOTSTATS. Alex-h (talk) 13:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.