The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 05:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of UK fuel economy ratings[edit]

List of UK fuel economy ratings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:NOTCATALOG. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages per WP:NOTCATALOG:

List of UK fuel economy ratings (A–D) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of UK fuel economy ratings (E–M) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of UK fuel economy ratings (N–S) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of UK fuel economy ratings (T–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Could you elaborate, per WP:VAGUEWAVE? postdlf (talk) 17:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. These articles are just detailed comparisons of fuel economy statistics for cars available on the UK market circa mid-2008 (I think, I haven't verified the date), apparently just a dump from the source (which is under the Open Government License so its not a copy vio). This is way to too detailed for a general-purpose encyclopaedia. At least the A-D article was prodded in October 2007 by Chryslerforever1988 with the rationale "WP:NOT#STATS, WP:INDISCRIMINATE". The prod tag was removed 9-days later without any changes having been made. Thryduulf (talk) 22:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not suitable content for a general purpose encyclopedia. While an individual vehicle's fuel standards are notable within the article on that vehicle, in this form it's neither particularly legible, nor does it have much encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.