The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hockey East Best Defensive Defenseman[edit]

List of Hockey East Best Defensive Defenseman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Hockey East but I'm not convinced it needs adding there. Boleyn (talk) 20:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article does meet notability guidelines WP:GNG outlined as described here: [1] [2] and WP:LISTN here: [3] [4]. Additionally, most of the people listed are noteworthy by themselves, specifically for being top-level professionals, and the list would meet the second and third criteria as outlined under Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Selection Criteria PensRule11385 (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - We have plenty of articles on college hockey awards and this doesn't seem any less notable than most of them. In addition to PensRule11385's sources, I can find a number of articles about players who won (or even almost won) this award where the award is deemed important enough to address, e.g., [5], [6], [7], [8]. Rlendog (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - per Rlendog. --Hockeyben ^{(talk - contribs)} 21:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.