The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Knw-Yr-Own Records[edit]

Knw-Yr-Own Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Search found nothing beyond passing mentions. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no assertion of notability independent of Knw-Yr-Own Records, What The Heck Fest and Anacortes. —Mythdon 12:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - standard searches not showing any usable significant mentions to show notability. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- self-sourced A7 material. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per A7. I'm not sure why this has been relisted; the article makes no assertion of notability whatsoever. FalconK (talk) 05:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete - I removed the PROD on this one because when the PROD came through, Google Books was giving three results that specifically talked about the label. It was my intention to investigate more thoroughly later, but real life and other wiki projects and all that. Because of the way Google Books changes the pages hidden for copyright reasons, it is currently only giving one result, and this is only a casual mention, so I can't defend the label on a GNG basis. 2 notable bands isn't really a "roster of significant artists", although I consider the label to have a "length of history", but it fails NMUSIC#5. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.