The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Guilbert[edit]

Justin Guilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have a feeling inmy (not coconut) water that if I CSD this entirely unremarkable businessman the notice will be removed because there is a reference or two. They are all about the business or product, sez I. And the coconut water tastes of spam to me, btw. TheLongTone (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 16:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete none of the references rise to the true level of reliable general sources needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:BIO, WP:ORG and WP:GNG. I found two sentences in a longer article in Vogue, but other references turning up in a gNews search seem to be confined to industry publications such as BevNet and Food Navigator. I think Inc. meets the reliable source definition, but that one reference in the article seems to be the only one, thus insufficient to establish notability. Last, the tone of the article is wholly promotional. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete GNG fail. The company might be notable, the co-founder does not seem to be - not nearly enough google-news hits - and most of them are passing/interviews in relation to the product/company.Icewhiz (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.