The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Callan-Thompson[edit]

Julia Callan-Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Keri (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - zero sources to attest to notability of this late model. The oblique reference to her son and her murder strikes me as a WP:BLP problem. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the absence of evidence for notability. Lepricavark (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The only reference provided is not authoritative and was written by the subject's son.--Rpclod (talk) 21:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 01:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.