Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Yguado[edit]

Josh Yguado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

co founder of Jam city (mobile game developer) and board member of a TV show. All sources provided and found are primary, either from web site he works for or interviews pieces which fails to the requirement to verify the WP:ANYBIO and a WP:BEFORE cant find any WP:RS to establish notability. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just made the article WP:BIO-compliant by replacing the company website link, and deleting the sentence with the article that was written by the subject himself.

100.12.249.14 (talk) 02:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment: 100.12.249.14, thank you for providing the source, however, it is a interview piece and would considered primary source and not WP:RS CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've just replaced that faulty source with a Forbes articles that meets the WP:RS requirements.
100.12.249.14 (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 100.12.249.14 Hi Thank you for providing another source from Forbes. It is considered WP:RS, but the article is about the organisation Jam City, part with interview piece of Jam City co-founder and CEO Chris DeWolfe. Josh Yguado is just mention in passing (interview piece as well). Let sit on this for some days for other editors comments and vote on this and see how it would be fared. However, at the mean time, if you could "multiple" independent reliable sources "directly" talk about MrYguado, pls do and do inform when it is done for if they are meets the requirements for I will withdrew the deletion nomination. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just added a USA Today article for the intro sentence, as the article identifies Yguado as "co-founder and President & COO," and then I added a 2013 New York Times reference regarding the MySpace acquisition. 100.12.249.14 (talk) 03:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I saw, they are both primary sources unfortunately. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you tell me what type of article would qualify? For instance, that USA Today article is by technology columnist Jefferson Graham, and profiles the company from the point of view of the USA Today newspaper, and reports news about it. Graham is an employee of USA Today, not Jam City. What exactly is the problem there?
[1] and [2] 100.12.249.14 (talk) 04:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Secondary sources "directly" talk about the subject and not merely passing mention - see Here 'source' section. You would send a message to me on your talk page or my talk to have further clarification on this for this is AfD discussion page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: Eh, this one is a really tough call for me. I do think that a couple of these sources, Josh Yguado is the primary focus of the article. See both: [3], [4]. I doubt that this article will ever be more than a stub, but I think the subject is notable enough to have their own article. But can completely understand delete !votes in this case. Nomader (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and WP:NOTINHERITED, Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to warrant a separate article. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found. Not enough here for a BLP. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply