The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Budine[edit]

Jonathan Budine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see enough significant coverage of this person or his work to pass WP:GNG or WP:DIRECTOR. It also seems to be created and heavily edited by a likely conflict of interest/undisclosed paid editor (Josubu, who has the same name as Budine's production company).[1] Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion:? While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously undeleted (Apr 15, 2007). --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2007-04 ↻ restored, 2007-04 ✗ deleted, 2007-04 ✗ deleted

I'm not completely sure about soft deletes (or what they're really for), but also a note to closer - it seems it was deleted and restored in the past as part of an article move, rather than a regular deletion restoration, if that makes any difference. - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:DIRECTOR, WP:GNG and the article has way too much unsourced material for a WP:BLP. I could only find one article [2] that mentioned this person and it is not enough to show WP:N. Google, JSTOR, Gale, NYT and Sage Journals searches did not produce additional sources. Z1720 (talk) 02:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.