The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Javad Marandi[edit]

Javad Marandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete Bio of a rich guy. References are interviews or quotations and/or are not independent and/or only mention him in passing and is not in-depth coverage -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agree with highking .....Sulaimandaud (talk) 23:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Agree that he is a rich guy, but one with influence- see his donations to the conservative party. His business interests are also current, with WED2B and Soho House Group.ADeliInMaBeli (talk) 08:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)ADeliInMaBeli[reply]
• Keep received a detailed profile in The Daily Telegraph who clearly thought he was worthy of note. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Agree with Philafrenzy, think he's worthy of people knowing about.Goldenducky (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Another AfD where WP:BEFORE applies. As well as the Telegraph profile, there is an article about him in Lux, and one in growthbusiness.co.uk - all in-depth and specifically about him. Therefore he easily passes WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.