The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Igal Dahan[edit]

Igal Dahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello. This article was deleted following a first AfD less than one year ago, and then there was a G4 deletion, but I think this new version is fairly different. However, sources are still Dahan's comments about the royal wedding - for some perspective, take a look at this "how to get featured in top publications" guide. There is also an interview on IdeaMensch - for some perspective, take a look at this "how to be featured on IdeaMensch" guide. Then there is the usual "Forbes contributor" article and a press release. To conclude: clear GNG fail, should be deleted and salted. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources are either not independent or are just quoting him, without going into detail about him --Danski454 (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete , insufficient reliable sourcing, and clear promotionalism . Suggest salting. DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.