The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with acknowledgments to Philg88 for his work on the article. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hulu Concept (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an advertisement. All of its sources are either WP:SELFPUB, or otherwise partisan, and search for WP:VER came up with nothing reliable. Article is likely solely for advertising, especially since creator likely has a major COI.>(some_info_on_creator_here) Mr. Guye (talk) 22:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've added two references showing funding for Hulu from the Hong Kong Jockey Club and the Government of Hong Kong, which are independent and reliable - there is other coverage out there in reliable sources. Article still needs a lot of work to clean up the Chinglish.  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update I've rewritten the article and I'm in the process of further improving the references.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete In its current form this is an advertisement and needs a major rewrite in order to be kept. Additionally most of the sources fail WP:RS. The few that don't do not provide the in depth coverage required by WP:ORG. Am willing to reconsider if someone wants to attempt a rewrite and can add enough sources. But as of right now it needs to go. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Changing my !vote to reflect the enormous improvements in the article. Tip of the hat to Philg88. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - The article has been renamed to Hulu Culture, the accurate name of the organization. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Source examples include CNN, The Standard and Muse magazine. Additional news sources include [1], [2], [3], but I am having difficulties translating these pages into English. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 03:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Close to a Heymann improvement by Philg88. It still needs work of course (doesn't every article!), though it's now sufficiently supported by 3rd party sources to establish notability. 91.125.29.135 (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.