The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huda Kattan[edit]

Huda Kattan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear motivated-efforts advertising because, not only has the article itself been tagged as an advertisement despite clear violations enough to suggest the article's deletion alone (this suggests paid advertising) in it alone; as it is, the article was never genuinely improved, and in fact emphasized its advertising worse when it was unimprovable; take the sources for example: 1 (2 is a clearly labeled self-PR interview) to 12 are all clear entertainment blogs, health guide listings, mere announcements or mentions or quite in between, next, the 12th is her own website, 13 to 19 are all again mere announcements and guides, until once again, 20 being an apparent press release, 21 to 24 are all same, until yet again, 25th is her own own advertised website again; continuing, 26 to 39 are all the same as before. We have our non-negotiable policies against such advertising because it's was founded this encyclopedia as it is, but also, the fact there's the clear attempts at keeping it an advertisement, which violates our simplest policies. In fact, simply take this which shows nothing but the same links as before, but this time actually emphasizing the mere consistency in PR from all available. This article overall is experiencing severe overfocus with such PR, such as beginning with an apparent PR-named mention, but then also the fact the 2 heaviest sections are the ones nearing the "Advert" tag, "Career and Awards", which shows there's nothing substantial here. SwisterTwister talk 03:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It may be paid advertising, which is despicable, but is Notable. As for the sources, hold a RfC to see whether they count. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 03:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 08:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 08:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 08:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 08:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Wikipedia is already way too presentist without people using paid advertising to get articles on themselves on it. This is not a vanity paublication, and we need to be diligent to keep it from degenerating into such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable, and clear promotional intent & writing. Articles that are primarily intended for advertising canand should be deleted for that alone unless they're notable enough for some volunteer to fix them. But in this case we don't have to concern ourselves with that possibility, beause none of the sources are good enough to show notability . DGG ( talk ) 15:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per DGG. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 13:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per notable. This user is and has been consistently ranked in the global top 100 Instagram accounts. She has over 17 million followers on Instagram. She is currently ranked above Kris Jenner, Snoop Doog, and Brittney Spears, to name a few. https://socialblade.com/instagram/user/hudabeauty . She has been requested/approached by top beauty manufactures such as Sephora. She is has been on the cover of Bazzar on now is on the front cover of Cosmopolitan (Middle East) https://www.facebook.com/cosmopolitanmiddleeast/photos/a.107005179379640.15917.107005116046313/1286811828065630/?type=1&theater . Need to really reconsider this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.78.160.34 (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Very promotional article. Unsure of notability. DGG's analysis is spot on. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.