Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to draft. ansh666 17:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First Ladies (film)[edit]

First Ladies (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has yet to enter into production. Should only be created when the film has begun filming. Already had a draft created at Draft:First Ladies (film). Delete per WP:NFF. – BoogerD (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: Redirect to Draft:First Ladies (film) and move the infomation from this article to the Draft. Vistadan 01:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have redirect that links to the draftspace? I ask because I'm honestly not sure if that is a thing. – BoogerD (talk) 01:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Keep Draft as place for development until it matches NFF criteria. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is fine as a draft for now. The film hasnt started shooting yet... Also, you can not redirect to a draft - that is nonsense. TheMovieGuy
Userfy: Could this article be moved to User:Vistadan/sandbox/6? Vistadan 02:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments: OK, well this is all a bit of a 'to do'. First, it looks like Vistadan has boldly moved their article to userspace, so this AfD can probably be procedurally closed – incidentally, I have also tagged the redirect currently at First Ladies (film) under WP:R2. Second, in terms of "precedence", BoogerD's draft at Draft:First Ladies (film) is slightly older than Vistadan's, but the difference is so slight that I suggest the versions be WP:HISTMERGED before being moved in Mainspace. But, aside from that, I'm glad to see this looks like it has been resolved. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply