The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fifths (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Music download cites are not reliable sources. The song did not position itself on a notable music chart nor was it covered in significant secondary coverage. Fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Redirect Cool beat but no RS to base notability on or write anything near a full article. Nothing on DJ Mag or similar EDM magazines. Nothing even on AllMusic.com besides the song list for the EP. —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 01:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Every song that exists does not automatically qualify for a standalone article; certain specific markers of notability, such as charting and/or winning a significant music award, have to be attained, but those aren't present here and neither is any hint of reliable sourcing. I strongly suspect that many more of deadmau5's song articles suffer from the same problem, though I haven't investigated that. Bearcat (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG, and it certainly doesn't meet WP:NSONG. Redirecting to the artist's article would also be okay. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.