The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FactoryFinder[edit]

FactoryFinder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though the name is factoryfinder this is a website which fails WP:WEBSITE Marvellous Spider-Man 17:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Marvellous Spider-Man:, thank you for your contribution for Wikipedia. In this article, would you explain more how this website fails the criteria of WP:WEBSITE? All the sources are independent from the website and reliable - Finnstechnology oy

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as simply all for a newly founded company hoping to gain and establish capital, including by having news talk about this and list hopes for obtaining said capital and also funding; none of this comes close at all for actual substance, and there would not be any meaningful improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO; the company is not yet notable, and the article exists to promote the business. The two awards listed are insignificant -- one is from a student-run association, and the other just links to the company Uber. My searches do not bring up anything significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.