- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A quick google search shows that this species does indeed exist. Even if this turns out to be an elaborate hoax then that fact would also be notable. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Eastern Australian sawshark[edit]
- Eastern Australian sawshark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason Kuma123 (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC) This species does not exist. It was on a list of shark species by mistake.[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I believe any vertebrate species is notable enough to deserve an article. Nergaal (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.