The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. ✗plicit 03:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cronomoon[edit]

Cronomoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during New Page Patrol. A combination of wp:NOR/ wp:notability / Wikipedia is not the place to try to establish / promote new terms. Article says that these are not known to exist. And the only sources in the article or that I could find in a search on the term "Cronomoon" all have the same one person as the/a author. North8000 (talk) 02:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Draft per WP:NEO. The entire article is based on a single paper by Mario Sucerquia which admits that they invented the name. I'm not opposed to a future article if other astronomers start using it, but it is WP:TOOSOON. --mikeu ^talk 18:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify TOOSOON.★Trekker (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree that this is WP:TOOSOON since this term is not in widespread use. Aldebarium (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.