Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cthulhu Mythos deities. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Lumley deities. King of ♥ 14:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clark Ashton Smith deities[edit]

Clark Ashton Smith deities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN. All current sources are primary. A WP:BEFORE search turns up unreliable websites, primary source books, a self-published source, and one article on this subject on Tor.com. More is needed to demonstrate this passes WP:LISTN. Hog Farm (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: That is not correct, I could find a number of short mentions to longer statements in third party sources looking for Abhoth and Tsathoggua in Google Scholar, some of these are however in foreign languages: Playing with Power, L’univers fantastique de Clark Ashton Smith, Icons of Horror and the Supernatural, Slime Dynamics, Enciclopedia de los Mitos de Cthulhu. And there are more. And that's not yet looking for every entry in this list. I as those who wanted to delete to reconsider based on the number of sources. Daranios (talk) 20:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply