The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christa Ehrmann-Hämmerle[edit]

Christa Ehrmann-Hämmerle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Accomplished, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show notability. And she doesn't meet WP:ACADEMIC either. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have added the full name of the journal she is an editor of, as there is another, longer established journal called just L'Homme. The publisher's webpage is added not because I think it helps establish notability (it doesn't), but as a source of that information. So far, my search has revealed that Hämmerle is one of several editors of the journal, and does not have a chair at her university (both criteria that could establish notability if she was the only or chief editor, and held a named chair). I will search more before voting. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete She fails several criteria of WP:ACADEMIC by a narrow margin. Btw, I corrected the article: she is not a journal founder, but at most a co-founder. -- Oisguad (talk) 08:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've added the prize she was awarded in 1999, and think this means she meets point 2 of WP:ACADEMIC. Tacyarg (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • This prize is hardly a highly prestigious academic award. It is worth only 5000 €, it is given only to women, there are six awardees per year, it goes into narrowly defined fields, it goes mostly to Austria. If you are a woman working as a feminist historian in Austria, then it may be hard to avoid this prize. -- Oisguad (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• hmmmm, like the olympics, originally winners only received a wreath of olive leaves, participants could only be men, and there were numerous events held, note, showing the ridiculousness of above statement, i personally reckon all olympians are awesome. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • Which would be the other point she meets in your opinion? -- Oisguad (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, an article on Ehrmann-Hämmerle (with no problems) with more info about her has been on the german WP since 2014, see here, she is a recipient of the 1999 Kaethe Leichter Prize, thanks to Tacyarg for adding this info to the article, (should probably have its own wikipage) that contributes to her notability (WP:ANYBIO anyone?:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above in regards to German wiki. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - inclusion on another wiki is not a valid reason for inclusion. The award is, at best, borderline notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable military historian. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Searching on "Christa Hämmerle", the name that appears as author on books and articles, I find many reviews and citations of her work. I believe that she does meet WP:NACADEMIC #1, "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." I have added some reviews to the article - more could be added, as well as more information about the areas of her research and its impact in the discipline. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.