Cannabis Ruderalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as sufficient consensus firmly established in the fact previous cases have shown notability is in fact granted here, reardless of GNG concerns or sourcing, which can be ultimately fixed, nac. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam[edit]

Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A school which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL. Sources are subject's website and its mirrors. No Depth Google search was unfruitfull. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 11:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 11:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 12:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 01:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Proven high school as per accepted long standing procedure. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment there is no accepted long standing procedure to keep all verifiable high schools. There is a recently rejected procedure to do that. Your !vote has no weight.2001:A61:3278:2201:ADC9:2E56:49F2:58B4 (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. The much-cited RfD did not undermine this. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply