- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Chinatown, Leeds[edit]
- Chinatown, Leeds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no Chinatown in Leeds, yet we have an article here on Chinatown, Leeds. There are no sources, and this reads like pure WP:OR. — Timneu22 · talk 16:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unwikified original essay. Carrite (talk) 16:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR violation. scope_creep (talk) 22:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:GNG and WP:OR. Guoguo12--Talk-- 00:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'd keep it if there was evidence that there is an unofficial term in common use in Leeds, but the closest thing I could find was a letter to the Yorkshire Evening Post saying that there should be a Chinatown. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You missed the earlier YEP article saying that Chinatown plans were likely scuppered? ☺ Uncle G (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:OR. Joaquin008 (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.