The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article was speedy deleted by Deb per WP:A7 and WP:G11. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CellSavers[edit]

CellSavers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company is not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Terrible sources showing no evidence of passing notability. Also, was created by an account almost all of whose article creations are corporate writeups with terrible sourcing, most of which have been PRODed or AFDed - David Gerard (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.