The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sourced exclusively to travel guides. Shii (tock) 11:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bungalow (restaurant)[edit]

Bungalow (restaurant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an apparently notable restaurant. All references point simply to travel guide sites rather than stating a case for notability under e.g. WP:CORP. At the moment the article fails WP:TRAVELGUIDE and WP:PROMOTION. A search for the owner's name brings up nothing significant (e.g. news coverage in a newspaper) either. LouiseS1979 (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, It's little more than a menu, an address, and their website. Nothing to point at notability. Bazj (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep More information about the restaurant has been added. Since I am still working on it, more information will be added to the article to establish notability. The restaurant actually has more significant coverage in the media than the owner. Eruditescholar (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as it honestly seems more promo than anything. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. -- Calidum 17:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I want to be clear as to what constitutes the promotional content in the article. Is it the stated menu, or the services described? Please, I need clarification Eruditescholar (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Menu list has been removed from the article and additional information added. Does it still look promotional? Eruditescholar (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your talk page. LouiseS1979 (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: – Highly promotional article with no evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless independent references can be found. Deb (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• delete despite the attempts at article improvement it still looks blatantly like an advertisement. LibStar (talk) 14:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nigerian spam.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lolz! I cannot stop laughing. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10/10 would laugh again –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.