The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Jon Radoff. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beamable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most if not all articles about Disruptor Beam and Beamable are simple announcements that fail WP:CORPDEPTH criteria. The article itself appears to fail WP:NCORP without significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Jon Radoff per WP:ATD. IgelRM (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Jon Radoff per WP:ATD - none of the sourcing meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Jon Radoff as a viable ATD per HighKing. Sal2100 (talk) 21:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.