The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Estcourt[edit]

Arthur Estcourt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER. No real significant achievements to speak of. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:SOLDIER. No credible claim of notability. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER. Elms^super 05:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one of thousands of good men that were killed in war but really needs something significant per above to have an article and I dont see it. MilborneOne (talk) 12:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.