The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Decisions are split between keep, merge (with no definitive target article) and delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Annamarie Saarinen[edit]

Annamarie Saarinen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources and in blogs/press releases thus, lacking significant coverage. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a clear lack of reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are a number of articles solely written about the subject that appear in notable publications including the New York Times, Pioneer Press, U.S. News & World Report and Minneapolis/Saint Paul Magazine – more than surpassing notability requirements for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dublin2020 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with The Newborn Foundation as the founder is not independently notable; the articles have either passing mentions of her, or they are about her without actually being about her (for instance the NY Times blog discusses her story, but the story doesn't focus on her, which I know sounds a bit contradictory). SportingFlyer (talk) 08:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per Dublin2020 rationale which convinces me. I do think the article is in need of an overall shape-up but that can be done with ease once the article is kept, per WP:NEXIST. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you review the sources? There's a question as to whether these articles were written solely about the subject. SportingFlyer (talk) 23:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per SportingFlyer. The Newborn Foundation and her combined seem to be notable, but not enough for separate articles. Manelolo (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.