The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Clausen[edit]

Andrew Clausen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Requested by Trap133 with the rationale "Fails WP:GNG"

I will add my own opinion in the discussion Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Before actioning the request for a deletion discussion I conducted my own WP:BEFORE. I accepted the request because I agree. Fails WP:GNG, with no obvious useful sources. The requestor's opinion is in the nomination. Mine is here in my !vote Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. Fails WP:GNG no significant news coverage and reliable sources. Trap133 (talk) 16:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC) strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. —Nnadigoodluck███ 12:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note please that this editor's !vote is in the nomination, made on their behalf, so this should be treated as a comment Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 _Talk 18:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Google Scholar h-index of 6 is indicative of modest academic output in his field. Uhooep (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as mentioned above he has a low scholar index, and we have not identified significant sources covering him in a way to pass GNG. He does not pass Academic notability point 1, and is not even close to passing any other academic notability points.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.