The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alison Green[edit]

Alison Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. No indication of significance. No coverage. scope_creep^Talk 18:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: not even clear what this person does, last AfD was for a journalist, this one is an entrepreneur. I don't see any coverage for them whatever they do, even in Gsearch there are a few individuals with this name. Lack of any sort of sourcing, nothing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete completely unremarkable career, that lacks indepth coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I thought this was Alison Green of Ask a Manager and was about to say "keep," but when I saw the actual subject of the AfD I have to agree with the nominator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect to John M. Green#Pantera Press: An article about an individual that doesn't meet general notability guidelines, SIGCOV, and WP:ANYBIO. In support of WP:ATD, redirect to John M. Green#Pantera Press, that way it can be preserved. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There is no significant coverage in reliable sources. GSS ^💬 02:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to John M. Green#Pantera Press PamD 08:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no coverage in reliable sources to support a redirect. scope_creep^Talk 13:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep I don't understand what you mean by no SIGCOV. From running BEFORE, there are sources that qualifies SIGCOV, rather my major concern was that it's not an entry for a stand alone article. See [1] by The Daily Telegraph (Sydney) and [2] from Australian Financial Review. Redirect is the best case here, so far we can verify she is the CEO and co-founder. I probably believe there can be notability in the future but not now! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first link is a pure PR and is not a reference and the 2nd one is a WP:SPS source as its interview. There is no valid secondary sources that proves this person is notable per long standing consensus. Merely appearing in the news doesn't make you notable. That is the reason the article has been Afd three times. Its non-notable with no coverage. None. The second one is also by "Hannah Tattersall Contributor". That is PR as well. It is a composite style article that you see all the time with business accelelator news of this type. Its spin for spins sake. It is all ersatz junk. Its all WP:PRIMARY and WP:SPS.scope_creep^Talk 23:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned this multiple times in my previous AfD discussions: the source from the 'Australian Financial Review' was authored by a contributor, not staff; hence, it should be treated as a self-published source. GSS ^💬 03:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I propose redirecting is because the target article has something to say about the current bearer of the is article. I am either way not proposing that "she" is notable, but with this primary source whatsoever, can clarify that she "has been, or was, or founded the publishing press." That should be the major alternative to this deletion. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Agree with nominator and others voting delete. No significant coverage in reliable sources and no justification for a redirection. TarnishedPath^talk 11:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.