The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Garuda3 (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afternoon Records[edit]

Afternoon Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources found for the record label, brief mentions in articles about Anderson, one of the founders. Largely a list of acts signed to the label. Nothing found about the company. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment No new sources found since the last AfD, which still wasn't much at that time to go on either. Oaktree b (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is the third time I have commented on an AfD for this label; I suppose that, if this ends in a keep or no-con, I will have to keep doing it again and again until I die, and a goodly long time afterwards, too. As before, the label has a sufficient roster and history to comport with the sense of an "important indie" per WP:MUSIC, and there are several sources, to boot. As a side note, I don't terribly object to the founder's article being merged into this one, but that's a matter for a different venue. Chubbles (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Low amount of WP:SIGCOV but possibly enough to pass WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 22:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there is WP:SIGCOV from Billboard (a top authority on music coverage) along with several other reliable secondary sources. This is a clear pass of WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 02:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - nothing's changed since the last nomination, so see my bloviatious statement at the 3rd go-round. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.