The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AXiomatic[edit]

AXiomatic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Queried speedy delete as advertisement Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)d[reply]
• Delete - Page reads like a puff piece and subject does not meet general notability requirements Meatsgains (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, clearly notable based on the amount of coverage, which includes the LA Times, ESPN, and Sports Illustrated. Given the status of this page as a stub it may be a good idea to redirect somewhere though.--Prisencolin (talk) 06:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Redirect or merge, what little content there is can be covered in the Team Liquid article.--Prisencolin (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and then Redirect to Team Liquid if needed, because even the 2 links suggested above as being convincing are in fact not, simply they simply focus with the ownership of the team, what ever else is listed here is simply trivial and unconvincing PR, also focusing with what the company would say about itself therefore certainly not convincing, and it's not surprising since this is advertising. SwisterTwister talk 03:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - the "RSes" fail to provide WP:CORPDEPTH - David Gerard (talk) 09:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.