The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

4i2i Communications[edit]

4i2i Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Nothing significant than some company like over thousands in the world. For being in wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a directory for companies like this. Light2021 (talk) 14:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - lots of press releases and churnalism, there was a bit of local coverage of their NASA deal but that's about it - David Gerard (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete by all means as this is advertising from listing the company's services and business information to then actually listing its client information; none of this would come close at all, and Wikipedia itself has changed substantially since 2007, so what would have been sources and information then are by far not the same thing now, especially when it's as blatant as this. SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Other than a few press releases, just a few mentions in local Aberdeen news; nothing to satisfy WP:CORP. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I could only find three very passing mentions in newspapers even when it was in its "heyday" so I don't believe it meets any relevant notability guides; I think it may now be defunct as are many of the micro companies established in Aberdeen and the Shire during that time period. I also tried searches using the CEOs name and still couldn't come up with anything substantial. SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There's hardly any indepth references to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.