Cannabis Ruderalis

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2007 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2007.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).


Yearly Logs (Full Log)
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

2007

Macedonia

  • Arising from some 3RR and edit warring issues, I have placed the following users on notice of this decision and the discretionary sanctions.
  • The first three users are not accused of anything but their edits within the area of conflict require them, in my opinion, to be on notice of the decision. The final two users broke the 3RR and I have blocked them both for that as well as giving notice of this decision. I will be checking back to ensure that things continue to go smoothly or if not to proceed to impose the relevant sanctions. Stifle (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I emphasize that these are protective notices only. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have created a user warning template, {{uw-balkans}}, patterned on Stifle's warning above. Sandstein (talk) 12:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed this template off the main WP:UTM page until we can have some discussion on this warning first before it goes live. As it says above ....editor fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, the expected standards of behavior, or the normal editorial process. the first line of this warning is ...administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. which does not look anything like the sanction statement. We do not impose sanction on any user also we already have to the warnings in pleace to deal with the three pertinant points in the sacntions and the uw-balkans warning is, in my opinion , over dramatic and reactionary, hence I would prefer to see a greater discussion. Also does this mean we are going to have a uw-kashmir, uw-northernireland, uw-armenia, uw-cyprus etc? Cheers Khukri 13:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think having that on the WP:UTM page is probably a bad idea bearing WP:DENY in mind. As to Khukri's point, are there ArbCom discretionary sanctions rulings in place on all those other matters? Stifle (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agapetos_angel

Alienus

Alkivar

  • (User rights log); 01:20 . . Drini (Talk | contribs | block) (changed group membership for User:Alkivar@enwiki from sysop to (none): per arbcom decision http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Alkivar#Alkivar_desysopped)
  • Burntsauce (talk · contribs) requested unblocking at 20:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC) for reason: "I would like to see my account reinstated. I was blocked using false evidence. I do not know JB196 and have never done his bidding. One case in point, I would like to ask as many knowledgeable members of the Wikipedia community as possible to review my talk page history. There you will find a number of messages left for me by presumably JB196 which I had no interest in, messages which I promptly cleared as unnecessary. It is unreal to me that I would be blocked for being a puppet of someone I do not know. Yes, I have removed unverifiable material from Wikipedia articles, including professional wrestling articles, but that is the extent of things there. I have received emails from multiple editors who have told me that the person who presented "evidence" of me being someone I'm not has also blocked other contributors under the same false pretenses, using evidence compiled in bad faith. I have made at least 8,000 edits to this project, I'd like to thing that they were a net positive (i.e. they improved Wikipedia as a whole) and if I am to leave I would like that decision to be mine and mine only. Thanks for consideration. I am available by email if this request is denied for any reason. " No action taken at present. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Burntsauce blocked indefinitely by me, and Alkivar requested desysopped at m:RFP. Picaroon (t) 01:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anonimu

Armenia-Azerbaijan_2

  • On 20:09, 2 September 2007, Chaser banned Atabek (talk · contribs) under Remedy 1 from articles and talk pages listed in that remedy for four days due to talk page incivility [1] [2].--Chaser - T 15:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hetoum I (talk · contribs) blocked 24 hr for 1RR violation [3]. Thatcher131 22:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hetoum I (talk · contribs) blocked 36 hr for 1RR violation [4]. Thatcher131 14:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Andranikpasha (talk · contribs) - following on from Ryan's measures, this account was blocked indefinitely as disruption-only (edit-warring followed by interminable wrangling). Moreschi Talk 19:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unblocked on 17 September subject to mentoring. Thatcher131 15:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artaxerex

  • Artaxerex blocked for one year by me. Picaroon (t) 20:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asgardian-Tenebrae

Attachment_Therapy

  • 19:48, August 30, 2007 Picaroon blocked "DPeterson (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 year ‎ (banned for 1 year per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy)
  • 19:49, August 30, 2007 Picaroon blocked "RalphLender (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (sockpuppet of DPeterson)
  • 00:48, October 31, 2007 FT2 blocked "AWeidman (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎(Reactivated sock of arbcom-banned user:DPeterson). (Note: block was also checked with and endorsed by Picaroon due to prior involvement in arb case).
  • 01:33, October 31, 2007 FT2 blocked "DPeterson (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 year ‎(Ban reset to 1 year following reactivation of sockpuppet AWeidman on Oct 29-30). (Note: block was also checked with and endorsed by Picaroon due to prior involvement in arb case).
  • 17:11, November 2, 2007 FT2 blocked "DPeterson (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (1 yr arb ban extended to community ban - unrepentant hardcore warrior. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive318)

Benjamin_Gatti

  • Under the terms of his general probation, and based on the endorsement of at least 3 administrators [8], Benjamin Gatti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned for one year from editing articles related to nuclear power, including their talk pages, enforceable by brief blocks, up to a week in duration, to be logged here. Thatcher131 00:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boris_Stomakhin

14:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC), Newyorkbrad blocked Vlad fedorov for one year (implementation of Arbitration Committee decision).

Carl_Hewitt

  1. Indefinitely blocked User:Anonymouser, User:2ndMouse and User:CarlEHewitt for being disruptive sockpuppets of User:CarlHewitt (violating the his topic ban at Logic programming, Delay (programming) and other articles.) —Ruud 23:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blocked User:71.198.216.63 for 1 week. Authobiographical editing on Logic programming and Computability theory (computer science). —Ruud 00:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blocked a number of IPs for revert warring and autobiographical editing at Carl Hewitt. —Ruud 22:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Blocked User:Prof. Hewitt for 72 hours for editing his biography then arguing over it on the talk page. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Blocked User:Prof. Hewitt for 72 hours for editing his biography immediately after returning from previous block. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply