The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1guardianweekly22042011.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• If this is the front page of the guardian newspaper, it would certainly not be in the public domain. Deadstar (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:P4250253.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Christopher Light, I am the person included in the photograph and authorize the use of the picture in Wikipedia" - who took the image? And "for use in wikipedia" is not enough of a release. Deadstar (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• • Okay, my son took this picture and that is me in the photo. I don't know who you are or where you live, but this is my photo (my son's) and my presence is in it. This was April 25, 2008 Chris Light (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • In that case, your son is the copyright holder, so your son should follow the procedure at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapheirsDukefirstlook.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be a non-free poster incorrectly tagged as own work by the uploader. Tagged as suitable for Commons by User:Sfan00 IMG, so maybe I have missed something. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning was that it might have been an independent producer, but I defer to your reasoning.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:P-KK08-000-011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF states "Property of TVS, Inc." Deadstar (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:RedHouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Note on the image reads: "Author:Sp Ranch Source: sp ranch.org Rationale: Research". This leads me to believe the file is not self made, and cannot be licensed as such. Deadstar (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altalk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File available here: http://spranch.calpoly.edu/mission.ldml which is the official site, and is copyrighted. The file here also looks as though it was taken from elsewhere rather than self made. Uploader might have connection with the institution but we still need OTRS. Deadstar (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:P.J.Brooke.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS permission needed for use of the image. Deadstar (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader contacted me, I have given information about sending on the permission to OTRS. Deadstar (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mask louise.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sole contribution by uploader, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 19:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbaer-church.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No date of publication given for the depicted painting...there is no freedom of panorama in Iceland. Possibly {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} but no way to tell from the given information. Kelly ^hi! 21:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Considering that the spelling around the picture predates the spelling reform of 1948, it can probably be assumed that the picture predates 1948. Also, considering that the text is in Danish, it can probably also be assumed that the picture predates Icelandic independence in 1944. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.