Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

3 December 2009[edit]

Suspected Copyright Violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2009-12-03 Edit

2009-12-03 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Theleftorium 17:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stubbed. MER-C 07:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Article created under the mistaken impression that press releases could be freely used on WP. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer strongly cautioned. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirected. MER-C 07:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stubbed. MER-C 07:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirected by author. MER-C 07:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a copyvio. MER-C 07:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Fairly lengthy quote, but I think it's defensible under WP:NFC Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer blocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright Investigations (Manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple article infringement[edit]
  • Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation fresh. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3ACopyright_problems%2F2009_December_3

Leave a Reply