Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
< April 1 April 3 >

April 2[edit]

Category:Children of Nero[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 16:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article. Not needed. ★Trekker (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Police association football teams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G7 without prejudice to a fresh follow-up discussion regarding Category:Police association football clubs (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Police association football clubs already exists Red Jay (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmmmmm... - there seems to be a mix of team and club categories. Which is more appropriate? Are we looking at a deletion or a reverse merge? Grutness...wha? 03:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is this now empty? -- It seems to have been emptied out of process. I would comment that these will be amateur teams (or clubs). Should the category exist? Peterkingiron (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - this is {{db-author}}, as Red Jay created it and no-one else has edited it. Oculi (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Acting theorists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus on top category; merge all the small sub-categories. For now, I will leave the American, French and Russian sub-cats (i.e. population 4 or more). – Fayenatic London 20:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I'm going to go on a limb here and say that the parent category and all of its subcategories that include "acting theorists" in their names should be deleted. In the over 10 years this category has existed, there has never been an article or redirect at Acting theorist, Acting theorists, Acting theory or Acting theories. Without some method in which to define this term via content in a Wikipedia article (whether it be an article itself or a section thereof), having categories for such a subject is unverifiable WP:OR in its use as a real term. So, as far as it stands at this point with the state of Wikipedia, the term "acting theorist" is at worst made-up and at best undefined. Steel1943 (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london: Ok thanks. That's quite odd. Also, do you happen to have an opinion on this subject? Perhaps you can conclude this thread and close it? Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Ternate City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:C2D, Consistency with main article's name. OktaRama2010 (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Male video essayists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename/rescope (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry WP:SMALLCAT. We don't have any category for Category:Video essayists at all, so there's no need to subcategorize them for gender before we even have a general category for the occupation in the first place. Bearcat (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Media in Evaz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry WP:SMALLCAT for one newspaper in a small town. Every town does not automatically need one of these the moment it has one media outlet with a Wikipedia article; it is only valuable if there are at least four or five media outlets to categorize, and otherwise the outlets should just be categorized at the provincial level instead of a one-item city category. The entry is also already in the "published in Fars" category that I've proposed for renaming to "Media in Fars Province" below, so no valuable context will be lost. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. When I created this (and similar Iranian media categories) it had quite a few more articles, but a lot of radio station articles have been merged since. Grutness...wha? 03:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that makes sense. We have indeed kiboshed a lot of poorly sourced and sometimes even entirely unverifiable articles about radio stations in the past few years. Bearcat (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Published in Fars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improperly named category. While categories for "Magazines published in X" and/or "Newspapers published in X" may exist, we have no recognized scheme of mixing magazines with newspapers in an undifferentiated "Published in X" tree -- if we aren't splitting magazines and newspapers up into their own magazine or newspaper specific subcategories, then they go in a "Media in X" category, not a "Published in X" category, and even if we wanted to split them up into "magazines" and "newspapers" categories on numerical grounds their parent category would still be "Media in Fars Province" rather than "Published in Fars". Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom To match similar categories. Dimadick (talk) 15:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jerk (band) albums[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 11#Category:Jerk (band) albums

Breakfast television by country[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: revised rename per Bearcat. – Fayenatic London 22:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To comply with WP:TIES. Per the Breakfast television article, "morning show" is the term used in Canada and the United States. I currently do not see anything on WP:CATNAME#Categories by country that says "Foo in country" categories have to retain the existing variety of the parent "Foo" or "Foo by country" category. Instead for example, compare Category:Footballers in the United Kingdom with Category:Soccer players in the United States, and Category:Tire manufacturers of Austria. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename - country categories should indeed use the local term. Category:Transport by country is another (transportation). Oculi (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to Category Television morning shows in Canada and Category:Television morning shows in the United States. It is entirely correct that the generic name for the type of show this is, in North American English, is "morning show" rather than "breakfast television". Admittedly one of the Canadian ones uses Breakfast Television as its name, but that's actually another reason why this should go forward — it makes the Canadian one look, wrongly, like an eponymous category for that particular show in isolation rather than a group category for all of them. But the term "television" should still be retained in the category names, because radio stations also have morning shows. Bearcat (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Bearcat's amendment. There are radio morning shows, too. Grutness...wha? 03:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename, but per Bearcat's proposal. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United Kingdom business law[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2C speedy: to match other subcategories of Category:Business law by country. Speedy was opposed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United States business law[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2C speedy: to match other subcategories of Category:Business law by country. Speedy was opposed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - that puts it out of sync with everything in Category:United States law, which takes precedence (local). C2C applies to any parent, so there is a clash. Moreover there is no American law (it's a redirect). Oculi (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Oculi....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Oculi. To amplify, the reason there is no "American law" is because there is no sovereign entity named "America". "American" is common casual usage but it would be confusing to reference "American law." --Lquilter (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3ACategories_for_discussion%2FLog%2F2020_April_2

Leave a Reply