The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tasha Wahl[edit]

Tasha Wahl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable businesswoman, promotional content fails WP:GNG Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 16:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 16:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - None of the listed coverage suggests better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Self-promotion of a non-notable individual.— TAnthony^Talk 06:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Current references insufficient to meet WP:GNG; if reliable references are added, ping me, and I might change my mind.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.