The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rajendrakumar Anayath[edit]

Rajendrakumar Anayath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NPROFWP:PROF. Mdann52 (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Do you mean WP:PROF? smileguy91^{talk - contribs}

Indeed I do - good catch! Mdann52 (talk) 18:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- article is entirely promotional, so it's even hard to figure out on what particular basis to begin to look for RS for notability. Was not able to find citations for the major sources. Seems like a good WP:TNT argument. (forgot to sign date is wrong: -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.