The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orbital airship[edit]

Orbital airship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is WP:CRYSTAL sourced from one company's marketing puff. Anything that needs to be said is already said in their article at JP Aerospace. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per speculation and crystal ball, just some marketing idea most of the article doesnt deal with facts just general ideas. MilborneOne (talk) 19:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. To clarify the sourcing, this company has been promoting its dream for over a decade and has achieved some cover in "what-if" related media. Everything traces back to the same source, I have found absolutely nothing of any independent substance (e.g. null return from JSTOR, nothing from NASA) to suggest notability. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unless it gets re written as a general speculative approach (in which case I wonder about the notability), it should be deleted. The fact that it is not in the least a straight forward method does not helps, either. Baldusi (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: nothing of benefit here, just pie-in-the-sky daydreams and marketing. - Ahunt (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.