The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^talk 15:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neuros Social Network[edit]

Neuros Social Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on non-reliable sources. Kavdiamanju (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 02:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 02:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. for all practical purposes, this amounts to advertising for a barely notable website. DGG ( talk ) 09:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Yann (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON. I was happily surprised to find some coverage of this social network in independent media, but there was not enough to establish notability. --Bejnar (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage in searches to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.