- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence seen of notability (WP:PROF, WP:GNG) joe deckertalk to me 02:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Louis A. Lucca[edit]
- Louis A. Lucca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I see no evidence for notability in this biographic tribute. It appears to have been translated from some other language, but I cannot find the original. Dr Lucca's only publications are his PhD thesis and a cowritten essay in a collection. (His bio at LaGuardia community college is at http://www.laguardia.edu/mediatech/faculty.aspx# - expand the word "biography") DGG ( talk ) 03:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF (in any case unlikely for a community college professor) nor of passing WP:GNG. I found one news story mentioning him but only in passing as the faculty advisor to a Phi Theta Kappa chapter, not useful for establishing notability [1]. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 00:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- in addition to finding little evidence of Notability, the cleanup effort necessary to bring this article to WP standards of writing and sourcing would reduce it only to the smallest of stubs. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.