- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Ken Hirschkop[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ken Hirschkop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. BLP with no sources, but two external links, neither of which are WP:IS. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Canada, and Massachusetts. UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I added enough published book reviews to convince me of a pass of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - with thanks to David Eppstein for doing the leg work to find these many, many reviews of the works, making a clear WP:PROF pass. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 06:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY. The added citations referenced above are easily enough to satisfy WP:NAUTHOR and WP:PROF. Sal2100 (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.