The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Meschino[edit]

James Meschino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable based on cited references, therefore fails WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Subject is an alt-med practitioner who wrote books and seems to have self-promoted through junket strategies. Delta13C (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as basically WP:PROMO. Sources are mostly pamphlets and promotional web ephemera. Subject has written numerous books, but WolrdCat shows holdings in just the double digits...barely a blip for the "self-help" mass market publishing sector. External links and some of the "sources" promote his private practice and book sales. Uncontroversial delete. I wish there would be an organized effort to systematically cull this kind of WP:PROMO cruft. Agricola44 (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete -- Agricola44 said it perfectly. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 23:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.