The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Omoraro[edit]

George Omoraro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Nswix (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete More promo puff pieces and advertorials as sourcing, from Nigeria. Getting an award from a church isn't notable, offering advice to the younger folks neither... This is getting to be a chronic problem on wiki, just based on the amount of these we see in AfD. Oaktree b (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  How does the fact that it comes , from Nigeria. make it less usable? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep: Zero evidence presented that the sources in question are paid. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Promotional sourcing and article. Avilich (talk) 22:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.